Research Question
How effective is a sand filtration system in
filtering baking soda, NaHCO3(s), from a 0.5M baking soda solution, NaHCO3(aq)?
Hypothesis
The HCO3- ions are the conjugate bases of a weak acid, while Na+ is a strong cation which does not
affect its pH. When some of the NaHCO3 dissociates, the basic HCO3- ions will increase the
pH. Filtering a baking soda solution, NaHCO3(aq), through a sand filtration system will decrease the concentration of baking soda solution, and thus be an effective filtration system.
Chemicals
|
Glassware
|
Measuring Tools
|
Miscellaneous
|
ü 82 g NaHCO3(s)
ü Distilled/Deionized Water
|
ü 1 L Volumetric Flask
ü Multiple 100 mL and 500 mL beakers for transferring
ü Distillation apparatus
ü 100 mL Graduated Cylinder
|
ü pH probe
ü Analytic scale
|
ü Magnetic Stir Bar
ü Hot Plate with Magnetic Stirring Function
ü Paper filters
|
Distillation Apparatus
("Rhodium Distillation Apparatus")
Obligatory photo of Arber smiling next to the distillation apparatus prior to transferring the NaHCO3(aq) solution to the round-bottom flask.
Top-down view of distillation apparatus set up with the solution of NaHCO3(aq) after going through the filter
Juan explaining the distillation process
Data and Procedures
Procedures before filtration
1. Mass 42.00 g NaHCO3(s)
and add it to a 1 L volumetric flask.
2. Add water to the volumetric flask
containing the NaHCO3(s). Fill to the mark for 1 L.
3. Drop a magnetic stir bar in the
volumetric flask and use a magnetic plate to mix the solution until the NaHCO3(s)
completely dissolves. Heat the solution at the lowest setting of the hot plate,
while leaving the cap off. Adjust the heating capability as needed.
4. Remove the magnetic stir bar and
quantitatively transfer the 500 mL of the NaHCO3 solution to a 500mL beaker, while
transferring the rest to another. One of these solutions will be used for Trial 1, while the other will
correspond to Trial 2.
5. Using a pH probe, record the
initial pH of both NaHCO3(aq) solutions.
6. Set a 500mL beaker at the output
end of the filter. Pour the solution of Trial
1 through the sand filter and
collect the yield with the beaker. Stir the solution with the stirring rod and
measure the pH after filtering.
7. Quantitatively transfer the NaHCO3(aq)
to a 100 mL graduated cylinder and record the volume. It will probably be over
100 mL, so this may be done multiple times by transferring some of the solution
to another 500 mL beaker.
8. Set up the distillation apparatus
and quantitatively transfer the NaHCO3(aq) solution to the
round-bottom flask. Heat the
solution until it begins to boil.
10. Monitor the solution closely and
turn off the heat source once the solution stops boiling. Record the volume of
distilled water collected.
11. Measure 75.0 mL of distilled water
with the 100-mL graduated cylinder and add them to the round-bottom flask once
it has cooled to collect the sand and NaHCO3(s).
12. Set up a system of vacuum
filtration using a Büchner funnel.
Filter the solution twice through with paper filters, and collect the resulting
solution with a 100-mL beaker. Record the volume of the collected NaHCO3(aq).
13. At this point, some of the volume
will be taken for testing for the Biology portion. Measure the volume of some
of the collected NaHCO3(aq) solution with a 100-mL graduated
cylinder and mass the solution with an analytic scale. Subtract the first value
from the last to give the mass of NaHCO3(s) dissolved in the
distilled water.
Experimental procedures and data after
filtration
0.50 M Solutions of NaHCO3
Trial
1
|
Trial
2
|
|
Initial
Mass of NaHCO3
|
42.032
g
|
42.039
g
|
Initial
solution pH
|
10.36
|
9.98
|
Initial
volume
|
500 mL
|
500
mL
|
Volume
after filtration
|
310
mL
|
Juan exemplifying his pride in mixing a 0.5M solution of NaHCO3
Only the Trial 1 solution from was filtered. Initially, the resulting
solution was covered in sand and gravel, but as the filtering process
progressed, the amount of sand and gravel decreased. The initial “muddy” output
of the filter was collected separately from the clearer solution that came
forth later. Their pH values were measured separately as different solutions,
before being mixed together again.
Muddy
Solution
|
Clear
Solution
|
Mixed
Solution
|
|
pH
|
9.15
|
9.42
|
9.40
|
Arber astounded by the opacity of different portions of the solution after filtered.
"Muddy" solution in right hand, "Clear" in left hand.
The pH values stay relatively close, suggesting that the
sand and gravel only make the solution slightly more acidic since when they’re
mixed, the pH equalizes to 9.40. Finally, after being distilled with a
distillation apparatus, the volume of the water filtered was found.
Volume
after filtration
|
310
mL
|
Volume
of distilled water
|
188
mL
|
Volume of NaHCO3,
sand, gravel, etc.
|
122
mL
|
Afterwards, 75 mL of distilled
water was added to the sand and filter in the round-bottom flask to remove most
of it. The resulting solution was vacuum filtered twice with a Büchner
funnel. Filter paper was used in the filter to prevent sand from remaining in
the solution, while suction was added to create a vacuum with the water. When
the filtering was done, the solution was much clearer than before, with only
traces of sand. Only 71.0 mL remained.
To measure the mass of the
remaining NaHCO3, 32.5 mL (approximately half) of the solution was
massed with an analytic scale. The volume was subtracted from the resulting
mass (assuming the density of distilled water to be 1.0 g mL-1), and
the result was the mass of the NaHCO3 that remained after both filtration
processes. Although obviously, some sand remained, we will assume this to be
negligible for the purpose of simplicity. Turning this value back into
moles (by dividing by the molar mass of NaHCO3) and dividing this
value by 32.5 mL gives an approximation of the molarity.
Volume
of distilled water added to the round-bottom flask
|
75.0
mL
|
Volume
of solution after filtration
|
71.0
mL
|
Volume
of solution massed
|
32.5
mL
|
Total
mass of the 32.5 mL solution
|
34.004
g
|
Mass
of NaHCO3 recovered in the 32.5 mL solution
|
1.5
g
|
Moles
of NaHCO3 recovered in the 32.5 mL solution
|
0.018
mol
|
Molarity
of the 32.5 mL solution
|
0.51
M
|
Conclusion and Evaluation
According to our data, the molarity of the
NaHCO3 solution did
not actually decrease as a result of the filtering processes. Instead, our data
shows that it increased, although this is because of the sand that was
inadvertently added to the solution. It seems that the molecules of NaHCO3 were small enough to pass through the
filter along with the water. Perhaps it was because only 32.5 mL of the
solution were used to verify the molarity; if a higher volume of the solution
was used, there would be a more precise measurement of the molarity. A markéd difference was noted in
the pH of the solution, however. The pH of the solution decreased from 10.36 to
9.40. This difference explains that although the filter did not necessarily
filter any of the NaHCO3 solution,
it did make the solution more acidic, and thus, more neutral.





We are the Manufacturer of magnetic stirring rod is helps to pop in & confiscate the bars from solution. Plastic Magnetic Stirrer Retrievers / Rescures at wholesale competitive prices from India. For more details check out our website.
ReplyDelete